Skip to main content

On the Temporary Government Funding Bill

 


Last week, Congress passed a bill to temporarily fund the federal government through December 3rd, averting an imminent shutdown. Here is an analysis of how a variety of media sources covered the story. 

Tends to skew right:

This headline is very to-the-point, with no noticeable bias in its language. However, the article uses a photo of Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi looking stern, which seems picked to display her in an unflattering light. The article itself features accurate details about the bill, such as that it passed with 254 votes in favor and 175 votes against and that it will fund the federal government through December 3rd. The author mentions that “Senate Republicans continue to fight against raising the debt ceiling while Democrats want to spend $3.5 trillion on a reconciliation bill that has little to do with infrastructure,” a statement that mixes facts with significant bias. It tries to pass off the claim that the reconciliation bill is not related to infrastructure as a fact when in reality, that is an opinion. In other words, the article is purposely misleading. The reader consuming this information may not even be aware that they are being misled, which is a dangerous aspect of our increasingly polarized, partisan media system. Ultimately, this article informs the reader that a bill has been passed to avert a government shutdown, but leaves the reader with the impression that Republicans begrudgingly supported the bill and are being dragged along by Democrats who want to raise the debt ceiling and spend large sums of money on a faulty infrastructure bill. This is not a neutral depiction of the situation.

Trends toward the center:

The language of this headline is very similar to the neutral nature of the previous one, though the AP centers Biden signing the bill rather than the House passing it. Another noticeable difference is that the article’s photo is of the US Capitol building rather than a particular figure. This makes the point that many people were involved in averting the government shutdown, rather than dramatizing it by assigning the responsibility to a single person. There are multiple instances throughout the article where dramatic language is used, including “as the political parties dig in on a dispute over how to raise the government’s borrowing cap before the United States risks a potentially catastrophic default” and a mention of Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen’s warning that the US “will probably face a financial crisis and economic recession” if the debt cap is not raised before the October 18th deadline. Overall, the information throughout the article is factual and not obviously tilted toward any side of the political spectrum. However, I do consider this article to be leaning into the other news biases like dramatization more than desired.

Tends to skew left:
Of the three outlets, this one has the most dramatic headline. Nothing in it is inaccurate, but the emphasis on the last-minute bill signing does create a sense of urgency that portrays the event in a theatrical way. I noticed that this article was more vague than the previous ones and did not include specific numbers like how many votes the bill received. It does provide more information than the other articles about Congress’ future options regarding government funding, such as a continuing resolution and the potential reconciliation process. I appreciate this because the article avoids falling into the short-term, narrow view of many news reports. Overall, this Washington Post article features a broader overview of Congress and government funding without any overriding bias.


My balanced take: 
After nearing the deadline, the House and Senate successfully passed a bill to temporarily fund the federal government through December 3rd, thus averting a government shutdown. In the House, it passed with 254 votes for and 175 votes against, with significant Republican opposition. Strife between the two parties regarding government funding is not over; the US will default on its debt if the debt ceiling is not raised by October 18th. According to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, this could create an economic recession and financial crisis. Ultimately, the passing of the funding bill is a temporary solution and Democrats and Republicans in Congress will need to work together to prevent further economic hardship from hitting the United States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

On the US Lifting Restrictions on International Travelers

  This week, restrictions on travelers entering the US that have been in place since the beginning of the pandemic were lifted. Reactions have ranged from joy to disapproval. Here is how some major media outlets covered the news: Tends to skew right: Breitbart: Tears, relief, long lines as US reopens borders after 20 months This article’s headline emphasizes the duration of the border shutdown and the emotional impact on those who were stuck or had family stuck overseas. It is not politically biased though, mentioning that Trump imposed the bans in 2020 and that they have been upheld by Biden until this point. One aspect that makes this article worthwhile is the original reporting it includes. It features quotes from people who reunited with their family at airports around the US, specifically JFK and Dulles airports. This made for an effective exploration of the issue this article covers. Overall, the tone of this article was much more positive than past articles I’ve read from t...

On Colin Powell's Death

  On Monday, it was announced that four-star general and former secretary of state Colin Powell died at age 84 due to complications from COVID-19. He was fully vaccinated. Here is how a selection of media outlets covered his death. Tends to skew right: Fox News: Remembering Colin Powell upon his death: Former President Bush calls him 'a great public servant' This headline is interesting in that it informs the reader that Colin Powell has died, but uses a comment from former President Bush to characterize Powell rather than simply stating that he was a general or former secretary of state. As two significant figures of the Republican party, putting Bush’s name in the headline with Powell’s was likely done on purpose to attract more readers. The article itself opens with President Bush’s quote that Powell was a highly respected man, using the credibility of Bush to vouch for the credibility of Powell. The author describes Powell as a “trailblazer” and includes statements of memor...

On the House Censoring Rep. Gosar

  This week, House members voted to censure Arizona Representative Paul Gosar for a violent video he posted to Twitter. Here is how a few mass media outlets covered the story: Leans toward the right: Breitbart: Cheney, Kinzinger Vote to Remove Paul Gosar from Committee Assignments A major thing that stands out about this headline is that it is not very clear. It never explains who Paul Gosar is or why he is being censured. Instead, it focuses on how two House Republicans voted in favor of removing Gosar from his committee assignments, and based on the content of the article this is because the author considers their actions a betrayal of their fellow Republican. The article even characterizes Representatives Cheney and Kinzinger as “so-called Republicans.” If you ask me, this is a fairly rude way to refer to members of Congress, especially when the article’s argument is that they disrespected another member of Congress. Additionally, in describing the situation, the article only me...