Skip to main content

On the Results of Virginia's Governor Race

 


On Tuesday, Virginians elected a new governor. Republican Glenn Youngkin beat out Democrat Terry McAuliffe in a close race and somewhat surprising race, considering that Biden won the state by ten points last year. Here is how a few major media outlets covered the news:

Tends to skew right:

Fox News: Virginia election caps Terry McAuliffe's stumbling, bumbling, error-filled campaign

As the headline shows, this article is a criticism of Democrat Terry McAuliffe and his gubernatorial campaign. In the opening sentence, the article touts Republican Glenn Youngkin’s “stunning victory” and notes that Virginia “went solidly for Biden just a year ago.” It goes on to describe some perceived blunders that caused McAuliffe to lose the race. It characterizes the campaign as exhibiting “an almost paranoid defensiveness.” The tone of the article is overwhelmingly negative and focused on McAuliffe rather than noting missteps of both campaigns. While it is often nitpicky, there are some valid points made about McAuliffe’s weaknesses, such as telling supporters that the election “was not about Trump--after spending months communicating the opposite message.” Overall though, the article is not balanced because it does not address any criticisms of the Republican’s campaign as well. It relies on attacking McAuliffe rather than providing an accurate summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each side. 

Trends toward the center:

Associated Press: Murphy ekes out win in NJ, GOP’s Youngkin upsets in Virginia

This article addresses both the Virginia and New Jersey governor races. Since I am focusing on the VA governor race, I will only mention those portions of the article. The Associated Press puts forth the point of many of last week’s articles, which was that a Republican win in Virginia would warn Democrats that “their grip on power in Washington may be in peril.” It notes that Biden won Virginia by 10 points last year and that the loss of Democrats in these current elections suggests “growing discontent among voters” regarding Biden’s presidency. The author mentions Biden’s comment that Democrats need to “produce for the American people” but adds that it’s unclear whether this will “jolt his party into action.” The article features background on both of the VA gubernatorial candidates and the key issues they focused on during the race. Unlike the Fox News article, information about both candidates is provided and it avoids biased language. Ultimately, the Associated Press provides a thorough look at Virginia’s election, the results, and what they could mean.  

Tends to skew left:

Washington Post: Republican Glenn Youngkin wins Virginia governor’s race

This headline is straight to the point, which contrasts a bit from the extremely long article itself. This article is essentially a case study of Virginia’s 2021 elections, including the lieutenant governor and attorney general races. It provides detailed information, including statistics about voter turnout, and quotes from Virginians who voted in these races. This is something that sets it apart from the other articles because the original reporting gives this story a human touch. It features a mix of Republican and Democratic Virginia voters who shared their views about the election, preventing the article from straying too far toward a certain side. This article also had interesting facts that weren’t featured in the others, such as mentioning the 3rd party candidate that was also running, and that McAuliffe would have been only the 2nd VA governor since the Civil War to receive a 2nd term. Overall, this is the most comprehensive of the articles. It illustrates the views of both sides without touting one over the other. 

My balanced take:
After hours of watching results roll in, Republican Glenn Youngkin emerged as the winner of Virginia's gubernatorial race. He beat Democrat Terry McAuliffe, former governor of the state from 2014 to 2018. This represents a political shift for the state, whose current governor is a Democrat and which went solidly blue for Biden last year. It could spell trouble for Democrats and their narrow majorities in Congress in the 2022 midterms.


Comments

  1. The media mainly just covered the horse race. They did not mention that Youngkin’s former company exists for the purpose of wealth extraction. However, Youngkin did a better campaign, and was able to energize the Republican base. The main reason that Glenn Youngkin won was due to the fact that the Democrats keep putting out neo-liberal candidates. The only way the Democrats have a chance at beating the Republicans is if they put out more young, energized, and progressive candidates. This was the case in Boston, where a young progressive woman won the race for mayor.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the Political Implications of Hurricane Ida

  Hurricane Ida pummeled the eastern half of the United States last week, disrupting lives and making the effects of climate change a reality to millions of Americans. Here is a look at the coverage from various major media outlets. Leans toward the right: Wall Street Journal (Opinion): Why Hurricane Ida Wasn’t Katrina The headline of this article and the headline of the Vox article are essentially making the exact opposite claims about Hurricane Ida, which I find very interesting. This article was published the day after Vox characterized Ida as “devastating” to the Gulf Coast, while this piece calls the handling of the hurricane “an American success story.” This is definitely the starkest contrast I’ve seen between outlets that are reporting on the same story. It definitely makes me skeptical; how can two takes on the same event be so different? Surely one of the articles must be spinning the facts. Before I move forward with my analysis of this article, I want to note that it wa...