Skip to main content

On the US Lifting Restrictions on International Travelers

 


This week, restrictions on travelers entering the US that have been in place since the beginning of the pandemic were lifted. Reactions have ranged from joy to disapproval. Here is how some major media outlets covered the news:

Tends to skew right:

Breitbart: Tears, relief, long lines as US reopens borders after 20 months

This article’s headline emphasizes the duration of the border shutdown and the emotional impact on those who were stuck or had family stuck overseas. It is not politically biased though, mentioning that Trump imposed the bans in 2020 and that they have been upheld by Biden until this point. One aspect that makes this article worthwhile is the original reporting it includes. It features quotes from people who reunited with their family at airports around the US, specifically JFK and Dulles airports. This made for an effective exploration of the issue this article covers. Overall, the tone of this article was much more positive than past articles I’ve read from this source. 

Trends toward the center:

This article has a similar positive tone to the one above. It mentions that travellers must have proof of vaccination and a negative COVID test and includes important details like that toward the beginning, making it a bit easier to follow than the Breitbart story. It also includes original reporting composed of quotes from those who were affected by the restrictions. One interesting perspective that was featured was a man and his daughter who live in Mexico near the California border and were not able to cross and visit a family member that lived just minutes away from them. This is a demonstration of the real world impact of the restrictions and how they were not flexible for specific cases. It does not approach the issue from any political perspective, instead providing a helpful neutral overview. 

Tends to skew left:

This article takes a different approach than the others. Rather than sharing the overwhelmingly positive tone of the previous articles, it focuses on how the US borders are reopening as Europe experiences a surge in COVID-19 cases. It includes a statement from the World Health Organization that Europe is currently “at the epicenter” of the pandemic. The author included original reporting from Charles de Gaulle airport in Paris, speaking to multiple people who were excited to travel back to the US to visit family after not being able to for such a long time. It also notes that many European airlines reported “full or nearly full flights” to the US. It closes by stating that some experts have worried about a potential winter spike in COVID-19 cases in Europe, but politicians are insisting that the reopening is good for the people and the economy. Overall, there is no overwhelming political bias, though this article certainly frames the issue in a more negative light than the previous ones.

My balanced take:
This week, the United States lifted existing restrictions on international travelers entering the country. These restrictions were put into place by former president Trump back in early 2020. Since then, access to the US for international travelers has been extremely limited, with many being separated from family for the past 20 months. Now, flights from Europe to the United States are back at full capacity, and border crossings from Mexico and Canada are open. All travelers must be vaccinated or provide a negative COVID test before their trip. Some are questioning the timing of lifting these restrictions, especially since the World Health Organization recently called Europe the “epicenter” of the pandemic. Mostly though, millions of people around the world are relieved to be able to visit loved ones and take trips to the United States.


Comments

  1. To begin, I feel that most people will positively react to this news. This is a huge step for many countries, as we all try to come out of the pandemic. While this may have a few people worried about what is next to come, this is imperative that we move forward nationally and internationally to overcome the pandemic. We are still taking precautions to ensure safety for all passengers, airport staff, and citizens. I believe this will be beneficial in the upcoming months, and am excited that we are taking adequate steps back to "normalcy."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the Facebook Whistleblower Testifying to Congress

  Last week, former Facebook employee and whistleblower Frances Haugen testified to a Congressional subcommittee that the company knows how to make its platform safer and prevent the spread of misinformation, but has decided not to in order to boost its profit margins. Here are the takes of various media outlets on the situation: Tends to skew right: Fox News: Whistleblower says Facebook is a US 'national security issue' This article focuses on the reported threat to America’s security that Facebook poses, which caters to the priorities to right-wing readers by centering the United States’ and its citizens' interests. The statements made by the Facebook whistleblower to Congress are featured predominantly through the article, with her claims of Iran’s espionage and Facebook’s “understaffing of the counter-espionage information operations and counterterrorism teams” mentioned early on. It notes the “rare bipartisan fashion” of the hearings and the desire of both parties to r...

On Colin Powell's Death

  On Monday, it was announced that four-star general and former secretary of state Colin Powell died at age 84 due to complications from COVID-19. He was fully vaccinated. Here is how a selection of media outlets covered his death. Tends to skew right: Fox News: Remembering Colin Powell upon his death: Former President Bush calls him 'a great public servant' This headline is interesting in that it informs the reader that Colin Powell has died, but uses a comment from former President Bush to characterize Powell rather than simply stating that he was a general or former secretary of state. As two significant figures of the Republican party, putting Bush’s name in the headline with Powell’s was likely done on purpose to attract more readers. The article itself opens with President Bush’s quote that Powell was a highly respected man, using the credibility of Bush to vouch for the credibility of Powell. The author describes Powell as a “trailblazer” and includes statements of memor...